Skip to content

Second Reviewer Cover Note — WS1 Truth Alignment

Document Classification: Governance Review Cover Note
Review Package: OjuIDC WS1 Documentation Reconciliation Package
Revision: v50

Purpose

This cover note packages a truth-alignment review for a second reviewer.

The reviewer is asked:

Does the documentation accurately describe the current evidence and clearly distinguish it from future plans?

The reviewer is not asked whether the architecture is good, whether OLUSO should become storage authority, whether AGBARA is the right successor, or whether AKODA should ultimately be retired.

Governance Status

Field Value
review_verdict REJECT_AS_WS1_COMPLETION
grc_posture BLOCKED_PENDING_RECONCILIATION
ws1_endpoint READY_FOR_HUMAN_REVIEW
ws1_commit_authorized false
ws2_authorized false

In-Scope Review Package

Provide the reviewer only:

docs/governance/
  ojuidc-master-topology-v50.md
  final-handoff-report.md
  reviewer-notification-v50.md
  v50-evidence-reconciliation-report.md
  second-reviewer-cover-note-v50.md
  second-reviewer-attestation-v50.md

docs/evidence/EvidenceBoundarySummary.md
docs/evidence/EvidenceBoundarySummary.json
docs/evidence/audit_report.md

Excluded / Quarantined (do not include)

  • approved_script_manifest-v51.csv
  • Test-OjuWS1Staging.ps1
  • promotion packages
  • receipt drafts
  • WS2 artifacts
  • any CUTOVER_AUTHORIZED / READY_FOR_COMMIT narrative packages

Four Primary Reviewer Questions

# Question Expected
1 Does the topology distinguish target architecture from current operational state? YES
2 Does any document claim AKODA retirement is complete? NO
3 Does any document authorize FSMO transfer, DC demotion, AKODA retirement, resource reclamation, commit, push, or promotion? NO
4 Does the documentation accurately represent the evidence package? YES

If answers are YES / NO / NO / YES respectively, the reviewer may select ACCEPTED FOR HUMAN REVIEW on the attestation form.

Approval Scope

approval_scope:
  documentation_accuracy: true
  architecture_truth_alignment: true
  evidence_alignment: true
  governance_consistency: true
not_approved:
  fsmo_transfer: true
  dc_demotion: true
  akoda_retirement: true
  workload_cutover: true
  resource_reclamation: true
  ws2_execution: true
  manifest_generation: true
  commit_push: true

Outcome Vocabulary

Use:

  • ACCEPTED FOR HUMAN REVIEW
  • RETURN FOR CORRECTION

Do not use:

  • APPROVED
  • AUTHORIZED
  • CUTOVER AUTHORIZED
  • READY FOR COMMIT
  • WS2 AUTHORIZED
  • AKODA APPROVED FOR RETIREMENT

Technical Reality Reminder

Even after attestation, retirement still requires a separate technical and authorization sequence, including approximately:

  1. Complete AGBARA onboarding
  2. Validate IRIN services
  3. Validate writable DC design
  4. Verify Cloudflare access paths
  5. Verify OLUSO storage expansion plan
  6. Review retirement prerequisites
  7. Human authorization
  8. AKODA retirement execution

The second reviewer is not approving that sequence.

Attestation Form

Complete and sign: docs/governance/second-reviewer-attestation-v50.md

The form is unsigned until a human reviewer fills determinations and signs.